Home : Civil Rights Claims : Jury Verdicts

Civil Rights Claims - Jury Verdicts

______ Defense verdict - Police Invasion Of Privacy - Entering Residence - No Warrant - False Arrest - Malicious Prosecution - Municipal Liability - Civil Rights - Defense Verdict
Facts: Plaintiff was an elderly woman. The temperature outside was 110 degrees, and plaintiff was concerned that her neighbor was neglecting her dog by leaving it outside without enough water. Plaintiff took the dog and brought it inside her residence. Defendant Baltimore County Police officer was sent to plaintiff's residence to investigate the "theft" of the dog. Plaintiff did not answer ...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (108000) Login for Civil Rights Claims Verdict
______ $293,000. See Editor's Note. - Malicious Prosecution Malicious Prosecution - Dispute Between Neighbors - Intentional Tort
Facts: Plaintiffs, a white "blue collar" family, lived across the street from defendant African-American couple. Defendant husband was allegedly an alcoholic and defendant wife allegedly had mental problems. Over a period of two years, defendants allegedly tormented plaintiffs. Plaintiff wife briefly operated a daycare in her residence. Defendant wife made obscene comments to parents as the...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (107764) Login for Civil Rights Claims Verdict
______ Defense verdict - False Arrest False Arrest - Assault - Emotional Distress - Malicious Prosecution - Intentional Tort - Police - Municipal Liability - Defense Verdict
Facts: Defendant Widenhouse, an off-duty female police officer employed by Defendant Baltimore County, was driving home when she observed plaintiff in the street directing traffic. Plaintiff's vehicle had become disabled in the roadway. When Defendant Widenhouse questioned plaintiff's actions, plaintiff allegedly became hostile, resulting in a physical altercation. Plaintiff was charged wit...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (107989) Login for Civil Rights Claims Verdict
______ $16,000 - Premises Liability Assault & Battery - Marketplace - False Arrest - False Arrest - Malicious Prosecution - Assault & Battery - Intentional Tort - Settlement
Facts: Plaintiff went to Defendant Lexington Market. A security guard arrested plaintiff and allegedly beat him.

Plaintiff alleged that he was falsely arrested and maliciously prosecuted by defendant and that defendant's security guard assaulted and battered him.

Defendant contended that plaintiff was intoxicated and harassing customers and, therefore, they ...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (105505) Login for Civil Rights Claims Verdict
______ Defense verdict - Malicious Prosecution Malicious Prosecution - Assault & Battery Charge - Municipal Liability - Intentional Tort - Civil Rights - Defense Verdict
Facts: Defendant Godlove, a deputy in Defendant Frederick County, served Plaintiff Leland with a summons on a domestic matter. After defendant deputy left Plaintiff Leland's office, Plaintiff Leland and his brother, Plaintiff Paul, followed him into the street. Plaintiffs allegedly assaulted and battered defendant deputy. Defendant deputy swore out an arrest warrant, charging plaintiffs ...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (105710) Login for Civil Rights Claims Verdict
______ $125,000 on plaintiff's claim and verdict for plaintiff on defendant's counterclaim. - Malicious Prosecution Malicious Prosecution - Embezzlement - Loss Of Reputation - Intentional Tort
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as an assistant to the manager by Defendant Apex Plumbing. Two of defendant's employees reported to the police that plaintiff had embezzled $3,000 from the corporation. The police were shown $3,000 in checks endorsed by plaintiff. A warrant for plaintiff's arrest was obtained and plaintiff was retained in jail for thirty days. At the criminal trial, the Cou...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (105736) Login for Civil Rights Claims Verdict
______ $1 million joint and several liability. - Malicious Prosecution Malicious Prosecution - Fraudulent Billing - Slander - Intentional Tort
Facts: Plaintiff was a psychiatrist at an outpatient psychiatric clinic. Defendant Blue Cross conducted a secret investigation of fraudulent billings. Investigators interviewed a family serviced by plaintiff, inquiring if their daughter had been at the clinic on two specific dates. The charges in dispute with plaintiff was $188. The state police joined in the investigation. Three peopl...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (110945) Login for Civil Rights Claims Verdict
______ Directed verdict (See Editor's Note). - Malicious Prosecution Malicious Prosecution - Bouncer - Assault & Battery - Defense Verdict - Intentional Tort - Assault
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a bouncer at a local night club. He became involved in a physical altercation with Defendant Anthony and fractured defendant's nose. Two weeks later, plaintiff was arrested for assault and battery. He was subsequently found not guilty of the charges. Defendant Frederick, Anthony's father, was a member of the Baltimore City Police Department.

...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (104997) Login for Civil Rights Claims Verdict
______ $168,000 Breakdown: $128,000 compensatory damages; $5,000 malicious prosecution; and $35,000 punitive damages. - Collection Contract - Collection - Travel Agent Commissions - Contract - Malicious Prosecution - Intentional Tort - Employment - Punitive Damages
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as an independent contractor by defendant travel agency acting in the capacity of sales manager/V.P. of sales. Plaintiff claimed that defendant failed to pay him appropriate commissions per a written contract. He quit his position and thereafter received no further compensation. Plaintiff was unable to document the monies he was owed because the documentatio...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (105033) Login for Civil Rights Claims Verdict
______ Defense verdict. See Editor's Note - Malicious Prosecution False Imprisonment - Trespass - Neighborhood Dispute - False Imprisonment - Trespass - Defense Verdict - Intentional Tort
Facts: Plaintiff and defendant were neighbors on a cul-du-sac. Plaintiff, who lived in the first house when entering the street, was in the habit of parking her car in the turn around of the cul-du-sac and then walking along a right-of-way (a dedicated easement) across five or six of the neighbors' lawns to get back to her house. On one occasion, defendant was watering/cleaning his driveway...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (108358) Login for Civil Rights Claims Verdict
Want to contact a Civil Rights Claims lawyer in District of Columbia? ...Get a free case evaluation from one of our Civil Rights Claims lawyers in District of Columbia now.

Content provided by JVRA.com. LegalView is not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided above.

Pages:   1   2   3   4   5   6   ...   Next

Need A Civil Rights Claims Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Were your civil rights violated?

Please describe the circumstances

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)


Want to contact a Civil Rights Claims lawyer in District of Columbia? ...Get a free case evaluation from one of our Civil Rights Claims lawyers in District of Columbia now.

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Civil Rights Claims Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Civil Rights Claims case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * Civil Rights Claims Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.
This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.